Loading the games…
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bulls | 33 | 20 | 32 | 25 | 110 |
 Pacers | 24 | 25 | 27 | 37 | 113 |
CHITeam statsIND| Team | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 42-8847.7% | 12-3040.0% | 14-1877.8% | 47 | 27 | 11 |
| IND | 38-8544.7% | 15-3641.7% | 22-2588.0% | 43 | 30 | 6 |
Point at or clickTap a player to see his shots, then his whole game from there. ClickTap a number under REB, AST, STL, BLK, TO or PF to see those plays.
Indiana Pacers113| 36 | 20 | 6-16 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0 | 0 | +12 | −4.0 | ||||||
| 34 | 14 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 0 | 1-1 | 0 | +13 | +2.7 | ||||||
| 34 | 18 | 6-14 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 0 | 0 | +10 | +3.6 | ||||||
| 22 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0 | 2-2 | +2 | −2.0 | |||||||
| 22 | 16 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −14 | +3.2 | |
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 28 | 15 | 4-10 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 0 | 0 | −7 | −2.2 | ||||||
| 23 | 10 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 0 | 1-2 | +11 | +2.0 | |||||||
| 17 | 7 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3 | −0.9 | ||||
| 16 | 8 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | −7 | +4.5 | ||||||
| 6 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | +0.5 | ||||
| 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3 | −1.4 | ||
| Team | 113 | 38-8544.7% | 15-3641.7% | 43 | 30 | 6 | 18 | 22-2588.0% | 6 | 7 | 3 | |||
Bench 43 points on 15 for 34 shooting
Did not play: Quenton Jackson, Kam Jones, Tony Bradley and Ethan Thompson (coach’s decision).
Chicago Bulls110| 32 | 14 | 5-15 | 1-5 | 0 | 3-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −9 | −6.0 | ||||
| 32 | 20 | 7-11 | 4-6 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | −8 | +4.7 | ||||||
| 30 | 25 | 10-17 | 3-4 | 2-2 | −11 | +6.3 | ||||||||
| 29 | 10 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 0 | −1 | −1.4 | |||||||
| 23 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +7 | −6.4 | |||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 29 | 19 | 8-15 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 0 | 0 | +3 | +0.1 | ||||||
| 28 | 13 | 5-9 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0 | −3 | +1.7 | |||||||
| 17 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | −1.2 | |||||
| 17 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | −6.1 | ||||||
| 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | −0.8 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | −0.5 | |
| Team | 110 | 42-8847.7% | 12-3040.0% | 47 | 27 | 11 | 22 | 14-1877.8% | 9 | 3 | 3 | |||
Bench 36 points on 15 for 31 shooting
Did not play: Lachlan Olbrich and Jevon Carter (coach’s decision).
Pacers113Bulls110ClickTap a team’s number to see the plays behind it.
PS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. The game’s highs are in blue, hot shooting in gold, cold in gray. ClickTap a column’s heading to sort by it.
Aaron Nesmith made a reverse layup with 13 seconds left, and the Indiana Pacers beat the Chicago Bulls 113-110.
The Bulls led 101-87 with 7:14 left before the Pacers went on a 26-9 run.
The Bulls had the ball down 3 with 2.3 seconds left, but Andrew Nembhard stole the ball from Josh Giddey. A 3-pointer would have tied the game.
During clutch time, the Pacers outscored the Bulls 12-7.
Pascal Siakam scored 20 points (13 in the fourth quarter), and Nembhard added 18 points and 9 assists. Siakam scored 13 of his 20 points in the fourth quarter.
For the Bulls, Nikola Vučević had 25 points and 9 rebounds, and Matas Buzelis added 20 points (13 in the first quarter) and 8 rebounds.
The Bulls forced 6 turnovers, about 5 fewer than usual for this many possessions. The Pacers outscored the Bulls 27-13 in 8 minutes with Siakam, Nembhard, Nesmith, Huff and Furphy on the floor together.
Indiana PacersChicago BullsPS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. Wins: how much his shots, free throws, turnovers and passes moved his team’s chance to win (1.00 is a whole win).
The five plays that moved the chance to win most, in order.
Each play from the side of the team that made it: its chance to win before and after, and the change in percentage points. On the court, each shot is the shooter’s face (gray when he missed), bigger the more it moved the chance. The Pacers’ chance bottomed out at 3.3% (4th quarter, 6:53 left).
91 points from the field on 85 shots: 4.2 fewer than the league scores from the same zones.
Point at a shooter to see his shots light up; click for his shots alone.
| Zone | FG | % | League |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the rim | 14-29 | 48.3% | 67% |
| In the paint | 6-10 | 60.0% | 45% |
| Mid-range | 3-10 | 30.0% | 42% |
| Corner 3 | 7-11 | 63.6% | 39% |
| Above-the-break 3 | 8-25 | 32.0% | 35% |
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaac Okoro | 16 | 8 | 2-3 | +2 |
| Patrick Williams | 15 | 4 | 1-3 | −1 |
| Jalen Smith | 15 | 4 | 1-5 | −1 |
| Matas Buzelis | 5 | 0 | 0-1 | −2 |
| Everyone else | 15 | 4 | 2-4 | −1 |
The tracking credits him with 20 points on 66 possessions. He usually scores about 23 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Giddey | 20 | 0 | 0-2 | −5 |
| Coby White | 11 | 9 | 3-4 | +6 |
| Ayo Dosunmu | 10 | 2 | 1-1 | −1 |
| Matas Buzelis | 8 | 0 | 0-2 | −2 |
| Everyone else | 17 | 7 | 2-5 | +3 |
The tracking credits him with 18 points on 65 possessions. He usually scores about 17 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Vučević | 10 | 8 | 2-3 | +6 |
| Matas Buzelis | 5 | 2 | 1-2 | +1 |
| Coby White | 5 | 0 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Ayo Dosunmu | 5 | 0 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Everyone else | 13 | 6 | 3-3 | +3 |
The tracking credits him with 16 points on 38 possessions. He usually scores about 8 on that many.
What the players each one guarded scored, against what they usually score on as many possessions.
Possessions, and parts of possessions when defenders switched, from the NBA’s matchup tracking. The line under a defender’s name: his share of the scorer’s possessions. Usual: what the scorer averaged a possession against every defender in the regular season, eased toward the league’s rate when he has few possessions.
Score margin over time — positive = IND leads, negative = CHI leads
IND Largest Lead
3
Q4 0:02
CHI Largest Lead
14
Q4 7:36
Key Scoring Runs (8+)
CHI 8-0 run
Q1 7:12 – Q1 5:58
-1 → -9
IND 9-0 run
Q2 2:54 – Q2 1:14
-9 → 0
CHI 8-0 run
Q4 10:18 – Q4 8:30
-5 → -13
IND 8-0 run
Q4 5:51 – Q4 4:07
-12 → -4
