Loading the games…
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Spurs | 34 | 29 | 26 | 32 | 121 |
 Bulls | 26 | 38 | 34 | 19 | 117 |
SASTeam statsCHI| Team | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAS | 44-8651.2% | 10-3330.3% | 23-2785.2% | 47 | 30 | 15 |
| CHI | 41-9344.1% | 16-3842.1% | 19-2382.6% | 45 | 29 | 12 |
Point at or clickTap a player to see his shots, then his whole game from there. ClickTap a number under REB, AST, STL, BLK, TO or PF to see those plays.
San Antonio Spurs121| 37 | 21 | 8-14 | 1-6 | 4-4 | 0 | 0 | −3 | −4.4 | ||||||
| 36 | 38 | 11-19 | 6-9 | 10-10 | +13 | +16.5 | ||||||||
| 32 | 19 | 8-18 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0 | +15 | +6.0 | |||||||
| 28 | 7 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0 | +11 | −1.8 | |||||||
| 21 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | −3.8 | |||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | −4 | −8.4 | |||||
| 20 | 16 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0 | 4-6 | 0 | +8 | +9.2 | ||||||
| 19 | 10 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | −6 | +1.3 | |||||||
| 10 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | −10 | −1.6 | |||
| 7 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −6 | −1.1 | ||||
| 4 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +0.5 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1.2 | ||
| Team | 121 | 44-8651.2% | 10-3330.3% | 47 | 30 | 15 | 17 | 23-2785.2% | 9 | 10 | 7 | |||
Bench 32 points on 13 for 27 shooting
Did not play: Bismack Biyombo, Jordan McLaughlin and David Jones Garcia (coach’s decision).
Chicago Bulls117| 33 | 23 | 8-14 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 0 | −1 | +6.2 | |||||||
| 33 | 20 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 0 | −18 | +6.5 | |||||||
| 29 | 11 | 4-14 | 3-5 | 0-2 | 0 | 0 | −14 | −2.1 | ||||||
| 25 | 15 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 0 | 3-4 | −8 | +1.6 | |||||||
| 21 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 0 | −3 | −8.1 | |||||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 33 | 20 | 6-12 | 3-5 | 0 | 5-5 | 0 | 0 | +6.6 | ||||||
| 25 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +9 | −5.0 | |||||
| 21 | 11 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | +0.7 | ||||||
| 9 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | +3 | −2.2 | |||||
| 8 | 6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +8 | +2.6 | |||
| 2 | 4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | +1.9 | |
| Team | 117 | 41-9344.1% | 16-3842.1% | 45 | 29 | 12 | 20 | 19-2382.6% | 11 | 10 | 4 | |||
Bench 46 points on 16 for 36 shooting
Did not play: Noa Essengue (coach’s decision).
Spurs121Bulls117ClickTap a team’s number to see the plays behind it.
PS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. The game’s highs are in blue, hot shooting in gold, cold in gray. ClickTap a column’s heading to sort by it.
Victor Wembanyama had 38 points (all 10 of a 10-0 run in the fourth quarter) and 12 rebounds, and the San Antonio Spurs beat the Chicago Bulls 121-117.
Wembanyama’s pull-up 3-pointer put the Spurs ahead for good with 27 seconds left in the fourth quarter.
The Bulls had the ball in a tie game with 1:00 left, but Harrison Barnes blocked Tre Jones’ driving layup at the rim, lifting the Spurs’ chance to win from 41% to 50%. It would have put the Bulls ahead.
Stephon Castle’s 2 free throws with 18.0 seconds left made it 119-114 and put it away.
During clutch time, the Spurs outscored the Bulls 16-8. Wembanyama scored 8 of the Spurs’ 16 on 2 for 2 shooting and 2 for 2 at the line.
De'Aaron Fox scored 21 points (12 in the paint), and Luke Kornet added 16 points off the bench. Wembanyama scored 18 of his 38 points in the fourth quarter.
For the Bulls, Kevin Huerter scored 23 points, and Ayo Dosunmu added 20 points off the bench. Jones had 20 points and 7 assists. The Bulls had 3 20-point scorers.
The Spurs shot 51.2% from the field to the Bulls’ 44.1%. The Bulls’ starters were outscored 28-18 in 8 minutes together.
San Antonio SpursChicago BullsPS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. Wins: how much his shots, free throws, turnovers and passes moved his team’s chance to win (1.00 is a whole win).
The five plays that moved the chance to win most, in order.
Each play from the side of the team that made it: its chance to win before and after, and the change in percentage points. On the court, each shot is the shooter’s face (gray when he missed), bigger the more it moved the chance. The Spurs’ chance bottomed out at 7.4% (4th quarter, 9:58 left).
98 points from the field on 86 shots: 2.5 more than the league scores from the same zones.
Point at a shooter to see his shots light up; click for his shots alone.
| Zone | FG | % | League |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the rim | 22-29 | 75.9% | 67% |
| In the paint | 7-16 | 43.8% | 45% |
| Mid-range | 5-8 | 62.5% | 42% |
| Corner 3 | 1-9 | 11.1% | 39% |
| Above-the-break 3 | 9-24 | 37.5% | 35% |
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Vučević | 34 | 18 | 6-12 | +6 |
| Jalen Smith | 13 | 5 | 2-2 | +1 |
| Matas Buzelis | 7 | 3 | 1-2 | +1 |
| Patrick Williams | 6 | 0 | 0-1 | −2 |
| Everyone else | 15 | 12 | 2-2 | +7 |
The tracking credits him with 38 points on 75 possessions. He usually scores about 25 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tre Jones | 20 | 0 | 0-0 | −7 |
| Isaac Okoro | 18 | 9 | 3-5 | +3 |
| Ayo Dosunmu | 14 | 4 | 2-3 | −1 |
| Kevin Huerter | 8 | 3 | 1-1 | 0 |
| Everyone else | 21 | 5 | 2-5 | −2 |
The tracking credits him with 21 points on 81 possessions. He usually scores about 27 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tre Jones | 28 | 8 | 3-4 | 0 |
| Matas Buzelis | 11 | 2 | 1-3 | −1 |
| Ayo Dosunmu | 9 | 0 | 0-2 | −2 |
| Isaac Okoro | 6 | 4 | 2-5 | +2 |
| Everyone else | 15 | 5 | 2-4 | +1 |
The tracking credits him with 19 points on 69 possessions. He usually scores about 19 on that many.
What the players each one guarded scored, against what they usually score on as many possessions.
Possessions, and parts of possessions when defenders switched, from the NBA’s matchup tracking. The line under a defender’s name: his share of the scorer’s possessions. Usual: what the scorer averaged a possession against every defender in the regular season, eased toward the league’s rate when he has few possessions.
Score margin over time — positive = CHI leads, negative = SAS leads
CHI Largest Lead
13
Q4 10:09
SAS Largest Lead
12
Q1 4:00
Key Scoring Runs (8+)
SAS 8-0 run
Q1 10:09 – Q1 9:26
-1 → -9
SAS 10-0 run
Q4 9:58 – Q4 7:05
+13 → +3
SAS 10-0 run
Q4 1:32 – Q4 0:18
+5 → -5
