Loading the games…
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Pelicans | 23 | 24 | 25 | 16 | 88 |
 Magic | 37 | 20 | 28 | 30 | 115 |
NOPTeam statsORL| Team | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOP | 32-8438.1% | 10-3132.3% | 14-1782.4% | 31 | 18 | 15 |
| ORL | 45-8652.3% | 8-3225.0% | 17-2181.0% | 43 | 28 | 13 |
Point at or clickTap a player to see his shots, then his whole game from there. ClickTap a number under REB, AST, STL, BLK, TO or PF to see those plays.
Orlando Magic115| 33 | 7 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0 | +9 | −8.6 | |||||||
| 32 | 27 | 9-18 | 2-5 | 7-8 | 0 | +8 | +6.3 | |||||||
| 29 | 7 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 0 | 1-1 | 0 | +11 | +0.9 | ||||||
| 27 | 11 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0 | 1-1 | +7 | +7.7 | |||||||
| 27 | 7 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +10 | −8.0 | ||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 24 | 11 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0 | +16 | −0.7 | |||||||
| 19 | 7 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 0 | +26 | +1.0 | ||||||
| 18 | 17 | 8-11 | 1-1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +17 | +2.0 | ||||
| 12 | 8 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | +14 | +3.1 | |||||
| 9 | 10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | +8 | +5.3 | |||
| 4 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | −2.3 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | −0.6 | |||
| 2 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | +0.7 | |
| Team | 115 | 45-8652.3% | 8-3225.0% | 43 | 28 | 13 | 14 | 17-2181.0% | 11 | 9 | 8 | |||
Bench 56 points on 22 for 33 shooting
New Orleans Pelicans88| 38 | 26 | 10-17 | 2-4 | 0 | 0 | 4-4 | 0 | 0 | −19 | +7.2 | ||||
| 35 | 21 | 7-18 | 4-11 | 0 | 3-6 | 0 | −16 | +0.8 | ||||||
| 32 | 12 | 4-12 | 0-2 | 0 | 4-4 | 0 | −6 | −6.1 | ||||||
| 26 | 11 | 4-12 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | −20 | −8.7 | ||||||
| 20 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | −30 | −3.5 | |||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 24 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −4 | −7.3 | ||||
| 18 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | −18 | −3.3 | |||||
| 13 | 10 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −11 | −1.5 | |||
| 13 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +10 | −6.8 | |||||
| 12 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | −6 | −1.6 | |||||
| 9 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −15 | −3.6 | |||
| Team | 88 | 32-8438.1% | 10-3132.3% | 31 | 18 | 15 | 19 | 14-1782.4% | 6 | 10 | 1 | |||
Bench 18 points on 7 for 25 shooting
Did not play: Zion Williamson (injury/illness).
Magic115Pelicans88ClickTap a team’s number to see the plays behind it.
PS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. The game’s highs are in blue, hot shooting in gold, cold in gray. ClickTap a column’s heading to sort by it.
Franz Wagner scored 27 points (17 in the first quarter), and the Orlando Magic routed the New Orleans Pelicans 115-88 to end a 5-game losing streak.
The Magic led by as many as 27 and never trailed, pulling away with a 27-10 run in the first quarter.
Goga Bitadze had 11 points (10 in the paint) and 9 rebounds. Moritz Wagner scored 13 of his 17 points in the fourth quarter.
For the Pelicans, Brandon Boston scored 26 points, and Jose Alvarado added 21 points and 3 steals.
The Magic shot 52.3% from the field to the Pelicans’ 38.1% and outscored them 74-30 in the paint. The Pelicans outscored the Magic 15-1 in 4 minutes with Green, Robinson-Earl, Boston, Alvarado and Jemison on the floor together.
Orlando MagicNew Orleans PelicansPS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes.
The five plays that moved the chance to win most, in order.
Each play from the side of the team that made it: its chance to win before and after, and the change in percentage points. On the court, each shot is the shooter’s face (gray when he missed), bigger the more it moved the chance. Chances from the site’s game model (the per-play numbers the Clutch and Performances tabs use aren’t built for this game).
98 points from the field on 86 shots: 0.9 fewer than the league scores from the same zones.
Point at a shooter to see his shots light up; click for his shots alone.
| Zone | FG | % | League |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the rim | 32-38 | 84.2% | 66% |
| In the paint | 5-13 | 38.5% | 44% |
| Mid-range | 0-3 | 0.0% | 42% |
| Corner 3 | 0-5 | 0.0% | 39% |
| Above-the-break 3 | 8-27 | 29.6% | 35% |
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Ingram | 12 | 9 | 3-4 | +5 |
| Jose Alvarado | 9 | 2 | 1-2 | −1 |
| Javonte Green | 9 | 2 | 1-1 | −1 |
| Jeremiah Robinson-Earl | 9 | 3 | 0-3 | 0 |
| Everyone else | 22 | 11 | 4-8 | +4 |
The tracking credits him with 27 points on 60 possessions. He usually scores about 19 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Theis | 8 | 2 | 1-2 | −1 |
| Jeremiah Robinson-Earl | 4 | 2 | 1-1 | +1 |
| Trey Jemison III | 4 | 5 | 2-2 | +4 |
| Javonte Green | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Everyone else | 13 | 6 | 3-4 | +2 |
The tracking credits him with 15 points on 33 possessions. He usually scores about 10 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yves Missi | 13 | 0 | 0-0 | −2 |
| Trey Jemison III | 12 | 3 | 1-1 | +1 |
| Brandon Ingram | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Jose Alvarado | 4 | 2 | 1-1 | +1 |
| Everyone else | 12 | 6 | 3-4 | +4 |
The tracking credits him with 11 points on 46 possessions. He usually scores about 8 on that many.
What the players each one guarded scored, against what they usually score on as many possessions.
Possessions, and parts of possessions when defenders switched, from the NBA’s matchup tracking. The line under a defender’s name: his share of the scorer’s possessions. Usual: what the scorer averaged a possession against every defender in the regular season, eased toward the league’s rate when he has few possessions.
ORL win probability — AI model powered by play-by-play data
NOP
50/50
ORL
Highest Leverage Moments
Theis Tip Layup Shot (2 PTS)
Q1 3:40
16.5%
95→78
F. Wagner 27' 3PT Jump Shot (12 PTS)
Q1 4:00
12.7%
82→95
Ingram 27' 3PT Jump Shot (7 PTS) (Boston Jr. 1 AST)
Q3 10:28
12.5%
79→66
Bitadze Tip Layup Shot (6 PTS)
Q1 2:48
9.8%
82→92
Green 26' 3PT Jump Shot (3 PTS) (Reeves 1 AST)
Q1 2:32
9.8%
92→82
