Loading the games…
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Pelicans | 19 | 27 | 18 | 30 | 94 |
 Pacers | 32 | 26 | 38 | 15 | 111 |
NOPTeam statsIND| Team | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOP | 35-8839.8% | 6-1833.3% | 18-1994.7% | 52 | 17 | 16 |
| IND | 42-9146.2% | 14-3836.8% | 13-1872.2% | 46 | 28 | 10 |
Point at or clickTap a player to see his shots, then his whole game from there. ClickTap a number under REB, AST, STL, BLK, TO or PF to see those plays.
Indiana Pacers111| 26 | 11 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 0 | 0-0 | +32 | +5.6 | |||||||
| 25 | 16 | 6-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +26 | +5.9 | ||||||
| 22 | 20 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 6-8 | 0 | +19 | +9.9 | |||||||
| 20 | 17 | 6-11 | 4-7 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +22 | +3.3 | |||
| 17 | 5 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +16 | −2.8 | ||||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 27 | 12 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 0 | −5 | −2.9 | |||||||
| 23 | 8 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +6 | −3.2 | ||||||
| 20 | 7 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | +18 | +2.4 | ||||||
| 19 | 6 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | +5 | +1.8 | |||||||
| 16 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | −15 | −2.2 | ||||||
| 9 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | −13 | −0.5 | ||||
| 9 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −13 | −3.2 | ||
| 9 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −13 | −4.3 | |||
| Team | 111 | 42-9146.2% | 14-3836.8% | 46 | 28 | 10 | 16 | 13-1872.2% | 8 | 11 | 9 | |||
Bench 42 points on 17 for 47 shooting
New Orleans Pelicans94| 26 | 12 | 4-14 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0 | 0 | −22 | −4.4 | ||||||
| 26 | 6 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 2-2 | −32 | −8.0 | ||||||||
| 24 | 7 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | −34 | −6.4 | ||||||
| 23 | 19 | 8-15 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 0 | −25 | +4.0 | |||||||
| 21 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | −22 | −6.0 | ||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 27 | 12 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +5 | −6.2 | ||||
| 21 | 8 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | +17 | +6.0 | |||||
| 19 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | −6.0 | |||
| 17 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | −6 | −2.4 | |||||||
| 12 | 14 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 0 | 0 | 8-8 | 0 | 0 | +15 | +5.7 | ||||
| 12 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | +15 | −2.3 | |||||
| 7 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −4 | −1.7 | |||
| 6 | 6 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +10 | +3.8 | ||||
| Team | 94 | 35-8839.8% | 6-1833.3% | 52 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 18-1994.7% | 11 | 7 | 5 | |||
Bench 48 points on 17 for 40 shooting
Did not play: Didi Louzada (league suspension).
Pacers111Pelicans94ClickTap a team’s number to see the plays behind it.
PS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. The game’s highs are in blue, hot shooting in gold, cold in gray. ClickTap a column’s heading to sort by it.
Domantas Sabonis had 20 points (10 in the first quarter) and 10 rebounds, and the Indiana Pacers beat the New Orleans Pelicans 111-94.
The Pacers took control with a 24-6 run in the third quarter and led by as many as 32.
For the Pelicans, Jonas Valančiūnas had 19 points (14 in the paint) and 13 rebounds. All 14 of Naji Marshall’s points came in the fourth quarter.
The Pacers shot 46.2% from the field and 36.8% from 3 to the Pelicans’ 39.8% and 33.3%. The Pelicans outscored the Pacers 56-38 in the paint. The Pelicans’ starters were outscored 46-23 in 14 minutes together.
Indiana PacersNew Orleans PelicansPS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes.
The five plays that moved the chance to win most, in order.
Each play from the side of the team that made it: its chance to win before and after, and the change in percentage points. On the court, each shot is the shooter’s face (gray when he missed), bigger the more it moved the chance. Chances from the site’s game model (the per-play numbers the Clutch and Performances tabs use aren’t built for this game).
98 points from the field on 91 shots: 2.9 more than the league scores from the same zones.
Point at a shooter to see his shots light up; click for his shots alone.
| Zone | FG | % | League |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the rim | 13-22 | 59.1% | 65% |
| In the paint | 6-15 | 40.0% | 43% |
| Mid-range | 9-16 | 56.3% | 41% |
| Corner 3 | 6-10 | 60.0% | 38% |
| Above-the-break 3 | 8-28 | 28.6% | 35% |
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Valančiūnas | 23 | 16 | 5-8 | +10 |
| Josh Hart | 9 | 2 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Jaxson Hayes | 6 | 1 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Brandon Ingram | 4 | 0 | 0-1 | −1 |
| Everyone else | 10 | 0 | 0-1 | −3 |
The tracking credits him with 19 points on 51 possessions. He usually scores about 15 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Ingram | 15 | 9 | 3-5 | +6 |
| Tomas Satoransky | 7 | 0 | 0-2 | −1 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 5 | 3 | 1-1 | +2 |
| Josh Hart | 5 | 0 | 0-0 | −1 |
| Everyone else | 10 | 7 | 3-5 | +5 |
The tracking credits him with 19 points on 42 possessions. He usually scores about 7 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Satoransky | 13 | 6 | 2-3 | +2 |
| Brandon Ingram | 13 | 0 | 0-1 | −4 |
| Herbert Jones | 9 | 0 | 0-0 | −3 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 5 | 2 | 1-1 | 0 |
| Everyone else | 11 | 5 | 2-2 | +2 |
The tracking credits him with 13 points on 51 possessions. He usually scores about 16 on that many.
What the players each one guarded scored, against what they usually score on as many possessions.
Possessions, and parts of possessions when defenders switched, from the NBA’s matchup tracking. The line under a defender’s name: his share of the scorer’s possessions. Usual: what the scorer averaged a possession against every defender in the regular season, eased toward the league’s rate when he has few possessions.
IND win probability — AI model powered by play-by-play data
NOP
50/50
IND
Highest Leverage Moments
Sabonis Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS)
Q1 4:23
12.7%
82→95
Hart 1' Driving Finger Roll Layup (2 PTS) (Ingram 1 AST)
Q1 4:04
12.7%
95→82
Martin 3PT Jump Shot (5 PTS) (McConnell 3 AST)
Q1 1:00
11.2%
77→88
Brogdon 3PT Running Jump Shot (8 PTS) (Craig 2 AST)
Q2 7:41
11.0%
82→93
Murphy III 3PT Jump Shot (5 PTS)
Q2 0:56
9.8%
92→82
