POR 125 @ LAC 104 — Mar 12, 2019 — stat.space

Portland

Trail Blazers

125

–

104

FINAL

Clippers

Date

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Arena

Attendance

N/A

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
POR	23	27	35	40	125
LAC	30	22	32	20	104

Game MVPs

Box score star vs. the player whose impact transcended the stat sheet

Key Contributor

Damian Lillard

POR

PTS

REB

AST

+12

+/−

Key Contributions

Deflections3

Contested Shots2

Loose Balls2

Opp FG% When Defending55.6%

Pts Allowed / Poss0.21

Impact Composite49.9

Hustle: 12.0Defense: 35.8Impact: 2.2

Double-Double57.1% FG3 deflections+12 plus/minusonly 11 pts allowed on 53.6 possessions

Box Score MVP

CJ McCollum

POR

PTS

REB

AST

+20

+/−

Game Performance

FG12-21 (57.1%)

3PT6-11

FT5-6

TS%74.0%

eFG%71.4%

STL2

TOV0

ORTG140

DRTG111

NET+29

35 points57.1% FG6-11 from 37 contested shots+20 plus/minusonly 18 pts allowed on 54.8 possessions

Box Score

POR	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Jusuf Nurkić	25:22	20	12	7	2	0	0	3	3	6-14	43%	0-0	0%	8-9	89%	+19
Al-Farouq Aminu	24:54	4	5	1	0	2	1	0	2	2-6	33%	0-2	0%	0-0	0%	+2
Gary Trent Jr.	2:31	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	+2
Enes Freedom	20:08	14	9	5	3	1	1	2	4	5-11	46%	0-1	0%	4-5	80%	-1
Maurice Harkless	26:41	6	4	3	3	0	1	0	2	3-5	60%	0-1	0%	0-2	0%	+19
BENCH
Jake Layman	25:14	9	4	0	1	0	0	2	0	4-8	50%	1-3	33%	0-0	0%	+16
Damian Lillard	33:53	20	3	0	12	2	0	3	2	8-14	57%	3-6	50%	1-1	100%	+12
Evan Turner	10:16	2	2	0	1	0	0	0	1	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	+8
Seth Curry	20:08	10	2	0	1	1	0	1	1	4-9	44%	2-5	40%	0-1	0%	+7
Zach Collins	12:53	3	4	0	0	0	0	0	1	1-4	25%	0-2	0%	1-2	50%	-1
CJ McCollum	35:29	35	4	2	4	2	0	0	4	12-21	57%	6-11	55%	5-6	83%	+20
TOTAL	—	125	50	18	27	8	3	11	20	47-96	49%	12-31	39%	19-26	73%	—

Meyers Leonard —

Skal Labissiere —

LAC	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Garrett Temple	14:52	7	2	0	0	0	0	0	4	3-5	60%	1-1	100%	0-1	0%	+2
Sindarius Thornwell	2:30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	-3
JaMychal Green	32:22	9	11	3	0	1	0	1	4	4-8	50%	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	-21
Tyrone Wallace	11:05	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1-4	25%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	-4
Lou Williams	26:35	18	1	1	3	2	0	4	0	5-16	31%	0-0	0%	8-10	80%	-13
BENCH
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	26:56	15	2	1	4	2	0	3	3	6-11	55%	1-1	100%	2-4	50%	-12
Patrick Beverley	31:59	4	3	1	7	1	0	0	2	1-6	17%	0-0	0%	2-2	100%	-14
Montrezl Harrell	25:48	22	11	8	3	0	3	2	3	8-15	53%	1-1	100%	5-8	63%	-12
Wilson Chandler	19:15	6	5	2	0	1	0	0	2	2-5	40%	2-4	50%	0-0	0%	-4
Landry Shamet	26:26	11	0	0	2	0	0	0	1	4-9	44%	3-6	50%	0-0	0%	-15
Ivica Zubac	22:12	10	15	9	2	0	0	1	2	4-15	27%	0-0	0%	2-2	100%	-9
TOTAL	—	104	51	25	21	7	3	11	21	38-95	40%	9-15	60%	19-27	70%	—

Danilo Gallinari —

Shot Chart & Zone Quality

Every shot plotted with zone efficiency vs league average

Team

View

Player

POR47/96 (49%)

Paint

29/52 (56%)

Mid

8/17 (47%)

3PT

12/31 (39%)

RA 58%ATB3 38%Paint 50%Mid 46%Corner 3 43%

LAC38/95 (40%)

Paint

25/61 (41%)

Mid

6/25 (24%)

3PT

9/15 (60%)

RA 45%Paint 32%Mid 15%ATB3 67%Corner 3 50%

Made

Missed

Hot (+5% vs avg)

Cold (-5% vs avg)

Matchup Breakdown

Matchup Matrix

Defense:

View:

Primary Matchup

Patrick Beverley

defended Damian Lillard

8.0 min • 4 pts • 25%

Best Defender

Lou Williams

held CJ McCollum

4.1 min • 0 pts • 0%

Got Cooked

Montrezl Harrell

vs Enes Freedom

5.3 min • 15 pts • 55%

LAC Defense	Al-Farouq Aminu	CJ McCollum	Damian Lillard	Enes Freedom	Evan Turner	Jake Layman	Jusuf Nurkić	Maurice Harkless	Seth Curry	Skal Labissiere	Zach Collins
Patrick Beverley	—	1.4m 0pts 0%	8.0m 4pts 25%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
JaMychal Green	7.1m 5pts 67%	—	—	—	—	—	—	2.0m 0pts 0%	—	—	—
Landry Shamet	—	5.4m 8pts 60%	1.3m 3pts 100%	—	—	1.7m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	—	—
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	—	1.5m 2pts 100%	—	—	1.0m 0pts 0%	—	—	5.4m 4pts 67%	—	—	—
Montrezl Harrell	—	—	—	5.3m 15pts 55%	—	—	1.8m 3pts 50%	—	—	—	—
Ivica Zubac	—	—	—	—	—	—	6.0m 10pts 50%	—	—	—	—
Wilson Chandler	—	—	—	—	—	2.9m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	—	2.7m 6pts 67%
Lou Williams	—	4.1m 0pts 0%	—	—	1.2m 2pts 20%	—	—	—	—	—	—
Garrett Temple	—	—	—	—	—	1.7m 3pts 100%	—	—	1.6m 0pts 0%	—	—
Tyrone Wallace	—	—	—	—	1.1m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	1.1m 0pts 0%	—	—
Other	2.9m 4pts 20%	1.9m 5pts 33%	3.5m 11pts 50%	1.9m 6pts 25%	—	2.6m 2pts 33%	2.5m 4pts 20%	3.7m 5pts 25%	4.3m 1pts 0%	0.9m 2pts 33%	2.0m 4pts 40%

Game Flow

Score margin over time — positive = LAC leads, negative = POR leads

LAC Largest Lead

Q2 6:49

POR Largest Lead

Q4 11:10

Key Scoring Runs (8+)

LAC 8-0 run

Q1 5:17 – Q1 7:52

+1 → +7