LAC 117 @ CHA 115 — Feb 5, 2019 — stat.space

Clippers

117

–

115

FINAL

Charlotte

Hornets

Date

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Arena

Attendance

N/A

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
LAC	26	27	31	33	117
CHA	25	33	34	23	115

Game MVPs

Box score star vs. the player whose impact transcended the stat sheet

Key Contributor

Lou Williams

LAC

PTS

REB

AST

+18

+/−

Key Contributions

Deflections2

Contested Shots6

Opp FG% When Defending35.3%

Pts Allowed / Poss0.35

Impact Composite60.7

Hustle: 13.0Defense: 44.6Impact: 3.2

31 points5-6 from 36 contested shots+18 plus/minusheld opponents to 35.3% FGonly 19 pts allowed on 53.7 possessions

Box Score MVP

Tobias Harris

LAC

PTS

REB

AST

-9

+/−

Game Performance

FG13-21 (61.9%)

3PT6-7

FT2-3

TS%76.2%

eFG%76.2%

TOV6

ORTG115

DRTG126

NET-11

34 points61.9% FG6-7 from 312 contested shots3 loose balls recoveredonly 36 pts allowed on 63.0 possessions

Box Score

LAC	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Jerome Robinson	6:16	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-2	0%	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	+1
Mike Scott	24:08	9	7	1	2	0	0	1	3	3-6	50%	3-4	75%	0-0	0%	+17
Sindarius Thornwell	13:34	0	2	0	2	1	1	0	2	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	+13
Marcin Gortat	12:52	0	7	0	1	0	0	0	2	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	-15
Lou Williams	31:53	31	3	0	6	0	1	1	2	10-23	44%	5-6	83%	6-6	100%	+18
BENCH
Patrick Beverley	29:35	15	6	1	3	0	0	1	5	5-7	71%	3-4	75%	2-2	100%	-6
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	17:38	6	2	2	3	0	0	0	0	2-8	25%	0-0	0%	2-2	100%	-18
Montrezl Harrell	27:57	16	10	3	2	0	3	1	4	7-13	54%	0-0	0%	2-2	100%	+4
Tobias Harris	36:11	34	7	1	5	0	0	6	2	13-21	62%	6-7	86%	2-3	67%	-9
Avery Bradley	39:56	6	2	0	1	0	1	1	3	2-5	40%	1-2	50%	1-2	50%	+5
TOTAL	—	117	48	8	25	1	6	11	24	42-87	48%	18-24	75%	15-17	88%	—

Tyrone Wallace —

Boban Marjanovic —

Johnathan Motley —

CHA	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Bismack Biyombo	14:17	7	6	2	1	0	1	0	0	2-2	100%	0-0	0%	3-3	100%	+14
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist	19:28	2	2	0	1	1	1	2	4	0-1	0%	0-1	0%	2-2	100%	-17
Jeremy Lamb	26:58	22	4	0	1	3	0	0	1	9-17	53%	1-4	25%	3-3	100%	+13
Tony Parker	9:14	4	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	2-5	40%	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	-5
Kemba Walker	38:47	32	5	1	9	3	0	0	1	11-23	48%	5-10	50%	5-5	100%	+3
BENCH
Marvin Williams	34:54	13	7	1	1	0	4	0	0	4-15	27%	3-12	25%	2-2	100%	+6
Cody Zeller	22:43	6	11	5	2	1	1	1	5	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	4-7	57%	-6
Miles Bridges	18:53	8	2	0	1	0	1	1	2	2-8	25%	2-3	67%	2-2	100%	-19
Nicolas Batum	40:18	9	6	2	2	0	1	1	3	4-9	44%	1-3	33%	0-0	0%	+6
Malik Monk	14:29	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	4-11	36%	3-8	38%	1-2	50%	-5
TOTAL	—	115	44	11	19	8	9	5	19	39-93	42%	15-42	36%	22-26	85%	—

Devonte' Graham —

Willy Hernangomez —

Frank Kaminsky —

Shot Chart & Zone Quality

Every shot plotted with zone efficiency vs league average

Team

View

Player

LAC42/87 (48%)

Paint

23/52 (44%)

Mid

4/19 (21%)

3PT

18/24 (75%)

RA 47%Paint 33%ATB3 72%Mid 13%Corner 3 83%

CHA39/93 (42%)

Paint

20/41 (49%)

Mid

8/16 (50%)

3PT

16/43 (37%)

ATB3 37%RA 48%Paint 50%Corner 3 38%Mid 29%

Made

Missed

Hot (+5% vs avg)

Cold (-5% vs avg)

Matchup Breakdown

Matchup Matrix

Defense:

View:

Primary Matchup

Kemba Walker

defended Avery Bradley

7.7 min • 15 pts • 40%

Best Defender

Marvin Williams

held Tobias Harris

3.9 min • 0 pts • 0%

Got Cooked

Jeremy Lamb

vs Patrick Beverley

3.3 min • 8 pts • 40%

CHA Defense	Avery Bradley	Jerome Robinson	Lou Williams	Marcin Gortat	Mike Scott	Montrezl Harrell	Patrick Beverley	Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	Sindarius Thornwell	Tobias Harris
Nicolas Batum	1.5m 0pts 0%	—	1.6m 0pts 0%	—	1.9m 0pts 0%	—	4.8m 4pts 40%	—	—	3.8m 5pts 67%
Kemba Walker	7.7m 15pts 40%	—	—	—	—	—	1.5m 3pts 33%	1.0m 2pts 50%	1.7m 0pts 0%	1.1m 13pts 83%
Marvin Williams	—	—	2.0m 2pts 100%	—	1.7m 0pts 0%	3.1m 3pts 17%	—	—	—	3.9m 0pts 0%
Jeremy Lamb	1.5m 2pts 33%	—	—	—	—	—	3.3m 8pts 40%	3.5m 4pts 100%	—	1.1m 2pts 50%
Cody Zeller	—	—	—	—	1.3m 0pts 0%	4.3m 5pts 50%	—	—	—	1.0m 0pts 0%
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist	1.6m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	1.9m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	—	1.9m 0pts 0%
Miles Bridges	—	—	5.3m 6pts 40%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Bismack Biyombo	—	—	—	3.2m 3pts 100%	—	—	—	—	—	—
Malik Monk	—	—	1.5m 4pts 100%	—	—	—	—	—	1.6m 0pts 0%	—
Tony Parker	—	1.6m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Other	—	—	—	1.9m 2pts 25%	2.8m 7pts 50%	3.9m 10pts 33%	2.0m 5pts 20%	—	2.7m 1pts 0%	0.9m 2pts 100%

Game Flow

Score margin over time — positive = CHA leads, negative = LAC leads

CHA Largest Lead

Q3 8:43

LAC Largest Lead

Q1 11:15

Key Scoring Runs (8+)

CHA 8-0 run

Q1 11:31 – Q2 1:35

-1 → +4

LAC 8-0 run

Q2 2:31 – Q2 3:56

+2 → -4

CHA 8-0 run

Q3 2:26 – Q3 4:19

+8 → +14

LAC 8-0 run

Q3 8:57 – Q3 10:38

+17 → +12