Loading the games…
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Wizards | 27 | 32 | 16 | 19 | 94 |
 Bulls | 36 | 32 | 19 | 26 | 113 |
WASTeam statsCHI| Team | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | 37-8145.7% | 8-3026.7% | 12-12100.0% | 37 | 27 | 16 |
| CHI | 43-8252.4% | 18-3452.9% | 9-1369.2% | 40 | 30 | 17 |
Point at or clickTap a player to see his shots, then his whole game from there. ClickTap a number under REB, AST, STL, BLK, TO or PF to see those plays.
Chicago Bulls113| 25 | 23 | 7-11 | 5-8 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | +6.8 | |||
| 25 | 5 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | −4.0 | ||||||
| 20 | 10 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0 | +5 | +3.9 | |||||||
| 17 | 12 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +14 | +4.4 | |||
| 17 | 6 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +15 | +0.1 | ||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 26 | 11 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | +10 | +2.1 | ||||||
| 23 | 14 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −5 | −0.1 | |||||
| 21 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +7 | −1.7 | |||||
| 18 | 5 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +10 | −4.4 | |||||
| 18 | 5 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | −2.6 | ||||||
| 16 | 18 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | +9 | +7.1 | ||||||
| 15 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3.4 | ||||
| Team | 113 | 43-8252.4% | 18-3452.9% | 40 | 30 | 17 | 17 | 9-1369.2% | 6 | 7 | 1 | |||
Bench 57 points on 22 for 46 shooting
Did not play: Omer Asik (coach’s decision).
Washington Wizards94| 32 | 9 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0 | −7 | −1.4 | |||||||
| 31 | 17 | 7-12 | 3-7 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | −4 | +2.1 | ||||||
| 31 | 8 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | −4 | −4.2 | |||||||
| 29 | 15 | 5-17 | 0-6 | 5-5 | 0 | 0 | −7 | −1.4 | ||||||
| 24 | 10 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0 | −7 | +2.5 | |||||||
| Bench | ||||||||||||||
| 21 | 14 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 0 | 2-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −12 | +1.7 | ||||
| 19 | 9 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0 | 1-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −9 | +0.5 | ||||
| 18 | 6 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | −12 | −4.0 | ||||||
| 16 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −7 | −8.4 | ||||
| 12 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −9 | +0.7 | |||
| 8 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | −0.3 | |||
| Team | 94 | 37-8145.7% | 8-3026.7% | 37 | 27 | 16 | 12 | 12-12100.0% | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||
Bench 35 points on 14 for 33 shooting
Did not play: Ian Mahinmi and John Wall (coach’s decision).
Bulls113Wizards94ClickTap a team’s number to see the plays behind it.
PS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes. The game’s highs are in blue, hot shooting in gold, cold in gray. ClickTap a column’s heading to sort by it.
The Chicago Bulls beat the Washington Wizards 113-94.
The Bulls took control with a 31-15 run in the first quarter and led by as many as 19.
Lauri Markkanen scored 23 points (15 on 5 3-pointers) on 7 for 11 shooting, and Bobby Portis added 18 points (9 during a 14-0 run in the first quarter) on 6 for 10 shooting off the bench.
For the Wizards, Otto Porter Jr. scored 17 points.
The Bulls shot 52.4% from the field and 52.9% from 3 to the Wizards’ 45.7% and 26.7%. They outscored the Wizards 57-35 off the bench.
Chicago BullsWashington WizardsPS, Performance Score: points above what an average player adds in the same minutes.
The five plays that moved the chance to win most, in order.
Each play from the side of the team that made it: its chance to win before and after, and the change in percentage points. On the court, each shot is the shooter’s face (gray when he missed), bigger the more it moved the chance. Chances from the site’s game model (the per-play numbers the Clutch and Performances tabs use aren’t built for this game).
104 points from the field on 81 shots: 16.2 more than the league scores from the same zones.
Point at a shooter to see his shots light up; click for his shots alone.
| Zone | FG | % | League |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the rim | 17-29 | 58.6% | 63% |
| In the paint | 6-14 | 42.9% | 40% |
| Mid-range | 2-5 | 40.0% | 40% |
| Corner 3 | 2-7 | 28.6% | 39% |
| Above-the-break 3 | 16-27 | 59.3% | 36% |
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markieff Morris | 24 | 3 | 1-1 | −3 |
| Otto Porter Jr. | 9 | 2 | 1-1 | 0 |
| Tomas Satoransky | 5 | 5 | 1-3 | +4 |
| Marcin Gortat | 4 | 6 | 2-3 | +5 |
| Everyone else | 8 | 5 | 2-3 | +3 |
The tracking credits him with 21 points on 50 possessions. He usually scores about 12 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Scott | 14 | 10 | 4-7 | +6 |
| Jason Smith | 10 | 8 | 2-3 | +5 |
| Everyone else | 7 | 0 | 0-1 | −2 |
The tracking credits him with 18 points on 31 possessions. He usually scores about 9 on that many.
| Guarded by | Poss | Pts | FG | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramon Sessions | 12 | 7 | 3-4 | +4 |
| Jodie Meeks | 12 | 0 | 0-1 | −3 |
| Otto Porter Jr. | 7 | 2 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | +1 |
| Everyone else | 11 | 3 | 1-4 | +1 |
The tracking credits him with 14 points on 46 possessions. He usually scores about 10 on that many.
What the players each one guarded scored, against what they usually score on as many possessions.
Possessions, and parts of possessions when defenders switched, from the NBA’s matchup tracking. The line under a defender’s name: his share of the scorer’s possessions. Usual: what the scorer averaged a possession against every defender in the regular season, eased toward the league’s rate when he has few possessions.
CHI win probability — AI model powered by play-by-play data
WAS
50/50
CHI
Highest Leverage Moments
Scott 3PT Jump Shot (3 PTS) (Sessions 2 AST)
Q1 0:03
13.6%
82→68
Portis 24' 3PT Jump Shot (9 PTS) (Lopez 3 AST)
Q1 0:45
11.2%
77→88
Meeks 3PT Jump Shot (3 PTS) (Sessions 1 AST)
Q1 0:34
10.4%
88→78
Porter Jr. 3PT Jump Shot (12 PTS) (Gortat 2 AST)
Q3 11:44
9.5%
77→68
Markkanen 3PT Jump Shot (18 PTS) (Valentine 2 AST)
Q3 11:24
9.5%
68→77
