LAC 112 @ CHI 106 — Mar 13, 2018 — stat.space

Clippers

112

–

106

FINAL

Chicago

Bulls

Date

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Arena

Attendance

N/A

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
LAC	31	31	28	22	112
CHI	27	33	18	28	106

Game MVPs

Box score star vs. the player whose impact transcended the stat sheet

Key Contributor

Lou Williams

LAC

PTS

REB

AST

+/−

Key Contributions

Deflections3

Contested Shots6

Loose Balls1

Opp FG% When Defending30.0%

Pts Allowed / Poss0.17

Impact Composite74.9

Hustle: 16.5Defense: 57.2Impact: 1.2

3 deflections6 contested shotsheld opponents to 30.0% FGonly 9 pts allowed on 53.1 possessions

Box Score MVP

DeAndre Jordan

LAC

PTS

REB

AST

+17

+/−

Game Performance

FG11-12 (91.7%)

3PT0-0

FT7-12

TS%83.9%

eFG%91.7%

STL1

BLK2

TOV2

ORTG124

DRTG100

NET+24

Double-Double91.7% FG12 contested shots+17 plus/minusonly 23 pts allowed on 67.2 possessions

Box Score

LAC	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Lou Williams	34:43	26	3	0	5	0	0	5	1	6-15	40%	1-7	14%	13-14	93%	+7
Sam Dekker	4:53	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1-1	100%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	-3
Austin Rivers	35:35	12	3	1	6	2	0	1	1	4-11	36%	1-5	20%	3-4	75%	+15
Jawun Evans	13:02	5	3	0	2	0	0	0	2	2-4	50%	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	-9
Milos Teodosic	24:44	7	4	0	4	0	0	1	1	3-8	38%	1-5	20%	0-0	0%	-6
BENCH
Sindarius Thornwell	30:10	3	4	2	2	0	2	1	3	1-3	33%	0-1	0%	1-2	50%	+19
Montrezl Harrell	10:36	10	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	3-4	75%	0-0	0%	4-7	57%	-10
Tobias Harris	37:24	18	3	0	2	1	1	2	4	6-14	43%	4-8	50%	2-2	100%	+16
Wesley Johnson	5:46	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0%	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	-8
DeAndre Jordan	37:34	29	18	3	5	1	2	2	2	11-12	92%	0-0	0%	7-12	58%	+17
Boban Marjanovic	5:33	0	3	0	0	0	0	1	0	0-3	0%	0-0	0%	0-0	0%	-8
TOTAL	—	112	42	6	27	4	5	14	14	37-76	49%	8-29	28%	30-41	73%	—

Sean Kilpatrick —

CHI	MIN	PTS	REB	OREB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	FG	FG%	3PT	3P%	FT	FT%	+/-
Antonio Blakeney	21:17	6	0	0	4	2	0	0	2	2-8	25%	1-3	33%	1-1	100%	+6
Kris Dunn	26:23	18	1	0	6	2	0	2	5	6-9	67%	0-2	0%	6-6	100%	-1
Cristiano Felicio	29:49	4	3	1	5	1	0	1	4	2-6	33%	0-1	0%	0-0	0%	+7
Robin Lopez	12:00	12	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	6-8	75%	0-2	0%	0-0	0%	-4
David Nwaba	27:49	15	4	1	1	1	2	1	1	7-11	64%	1-2	50%	0-0	0%	-2
BENCH
Denzel Valentine	20:30	4	7	1	2	0	0	2	2	2-6	33%	0-1	0%	0-1	0%	-3
Noah Vonleh	27:04	8	7	3	2	1	0	1	4	3-11	27%	0-5	0%	2-2	100%	-16
Zach LaVine	26:24	10	6	1	2	0	0	2	3	3-13	23%	1-5	20%	3-3	100%	-13
Bobby Portis	27:07	19	9	1	1	2	0	0	5	8-19	42%	3-6	50%	0-0	0%	+1
Cameron Payne	21:37	10	5	0	3	2	0	0	2	4-10	40%	1-2	50%	1-2	50%	-5
TOTAL	—	106	45	11	26	11	2	9	28	43-101	43%	7-29	24%	13-15	87%	—

Omer Asik —

Jerian Grant —

Justin Holiday —

Shot Chart & Zone Quality

Every shot plotted with zone efficiency vs league average

Team

View

Player

LAC37/76 (49%)

Paint

27/39 (69%)

Mid

3/12 (25%)

3PT

8/29 (28%)

RA 78%ATB3 19%Paint 38%Corner 3 50%Mid 14%

CHI43/101 (43%)

Paint

30/54 (56%)

Mid

6/22 (27%)

3PT

9/32 (28%)

RA 64%ATB3 31%Paint 42%Mid 25%Corner 3 0%

Made

Missed

Hot (+5% vs avg)

Cold (-5% vs avg)

Matchup Breakdown

Matchup Matrix

Defense:

View:

Primary Matchup

David Nwaba

defended Lou Williams

8.4 min • 9 pts • 80%

Best Defender

Denzel Valentine

held Sindarius Thornwell

3.6 min • 0 pts • 0%

Got Cooked

Bobby Portis

vs Montrezl Harrell

2.0 min • 10 pts • 67%

CHI Defense	Austin Rivers	Boban Marjanovic	DeAndre Jordan	Jawun Evans	Lou Williams	Milos Teodosic	Montrezl Harrell	Sam Dekker	Sindarius Thornwell	Tobias Harris	Wesley Johnson
Cristiano Felicio	—	1.6m 0pts 0%	5.9m 2pts 33%	—	—	—	1.8m 0pts 0%	—	—	1.1m 0pts 0%	—
David Nwaba	1.4m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	8.4m 9pts 80%	—	—	—	—	—	—
Zach LaVine	1.7m 2pts 33%	—	—	—	1.5m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	5.8m 4pts 14%	—	—
Noah Vonleh	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.5m 0pts 0%	7.2m 4pts 40%	—
Bobby Portis	—	—	2.2m 2pts 50%	—	—	—	2.0m 10pts 67%	1.3m 4pts 67%	—	2.8m 0pts 0%	—
Kris Dunn	6.0m 4pts 50%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.2m 6pts 67%	—
Cameron Payne	2.9m 2pts 50%	—	—	2.8m 6pts 40%	—	1.3m 0pts 0%	—	—	—	—	—
Denzel Valentine	—	—	—	—	—	1.2m 2pts 50%	—	—	3.6m 0pts 0%	—	1.5m 0pts 0%
Antonio Blakeney	—	—	—	—	—	4.6m 3pts 33%	—	—	—	—	—
Robin Lopez	—	—	4.0m 10pts 83%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Other	2.9m 2pts 33%	0.5m 5pts 100%	3.6m 10pts 50%	3.0m 2pts 0%	4.7m 5pts 100%	3.1m 2pts 20%	0.6m 2pts 50%	—	1.8m 2pts 17%	3.5m 10pts 56%	—

Game Flow

Score margin over time — positive = CHI leads, negative = LAC leads

CHI Largest Lead

Q2 8:18

LAC Largest Lead

Q3 11:23

Key Scoring Runs (8+)

CHI 8-0 run

Q2 1:44 – Q2 2:17

-2 → +4